The Place Promised in Our Early Days
I could have done an ‘easy’ review today but I felt like a challenge. Like my Haibane Renmei review the other day, this is a piece of anime that I find damned hard to review in any sort of objective way (what you are about to read took over a week); I even made a point of watching Byousoku 5cm to get a clearer idea of where this film stands today as part of Shinkai’s body of work, hoping it would help me and also make this post relevant to the time of writing. I think it can be argued that The Place Promised…’s successor is more sophisticated and ‘grown-up’ but I still have what I can only describe as a sentimental attachment to this one. It isn’t a perfect film, it isn’t even his best and it lacks certain elements that its successor - and predecessor - have, but I’ll get to those in a minute. It is, however, still special and moving enough for me to comment on it at excessive length.

I don’t even need to outline how good this movie looks - after all, Makoto Shinkai made his name through making Voices of a Distant Star, a film he animated almost on his own that still looked gorgeous so I guess everyone expects this to be a work of art in that sense. The Place Promised… is an evolution of Voices…, but crucially his style has been maintained even with the fuller roll-call of production staff who took a share of the workload and influence over how the end product would look. The motifs, the character designs, even Tenmon’s involvement with the musical score (I’d like to draw attention to that plaintive violin piece in particular) are familiar; this still feels like Shinkai’s movie, just on a larger scale. Simulated lens flares, sweeping landscapes, it’s all everything you’d expect it to be: beautiful. As in, capture a random screenshot, frame it and hang it on your living room wall kind of beautiful.
Because its running time is that of a fully-fledged feature film, it has opportunity to properly introduce characters and their respective situations - it’s built along a timeline in which events can unfold and progress; unlike Voices…, which was formed around a single and not particularly linear idea, it takes the viewer on a journey. On the downside, the feelings you experience are diluted, as it were: Voices… is memorable to me because it’s a short, sweet, compact shot to the heart. If that was the demo tape, this is the full LP which allows the vision of its creator to be realised more fully but requires a bit of patience; patience that is of course ultimately rewarded.

I loved the way in which it shows people form friendships, share dreams only to drift apart later on and experience the heartache that goes with it; it’s portrayed with brilliant imagery, loving attention to detail and an unhurried pace that gives the viewer time to take in and inwardly digest the significance of events. Those extended background sequences are used here for this purpose; often including Shinkai’s trademark sunsets, thry give the viewer ample time for reflection. Although the ‘new Miyazaki’ label really is innacurate and a disservice to both directors, the technical talent for almost-photorealistic backgrounds would *hypothetically* have its creator on Studio Ghibli’s employ in a heartbeat. The art style is unique and quite frankly without parallel right now but what matters is that Shinkai uses these techniques to such great effect.
Without character development of course, all this would be a hollow and futile venture. The bond between Hiroki and Takuya is shown right from the outset as they share schoolroom banter and heartfelt secrets in a way that only close friends can; despite the appearances of harmony that exist when the two of them hang out with Sayuri, there’s the ominous feeling that three’s a crowd. When this could fall into the love triangle cliche, it provides something more interesting: two friends who must resolve their differences to save a person who is precious to both, but precious in a different way for each of them. A potential sticking point is how Sayuri’s character is asleep for quite a bit of the film so is unable to take an active part in influencing the film’s course. The science fiction/fantasy theme of parallel universes and dreams comes into play here, adding as Shinkai did with Voices…, a fantastical element to a very down-to-earth tale; here, a character is trapped, alone and in need of rescuing.

And therein lies what I can see as the movie’s only flaw. The viewer’s empathy with them requires plot points that echo our own life experiences very closely; this could be hampered by unfamiliar concepts or events that may confuse or distract those expecting a purely drama-driven piece that is firmly rooted in reality. Would these elements prevent a viewer from being able to relate to their own life experiences (if you’re confused, check out a fellow blogger’s astute observation of this problem)? Would those outside of anime and sci-fi fandom circles, who are used to movies with parallel universes and whatnot, see it as a film that still exhibits the perceived anime quirks of colouring a movie’s narrative with technobabble? Of course, eliminating the Tower, Sayuri’s sleeping sickness and so on will take out a lot of the story so there’s not much that can be done without essentially turning it into a different film altogether. It’s strange, but if I hadn’t seen Byousoku 5cm to compare, this nagging doubt would never have occured to me (if I hadn’t read Owen’s post either, it still may not have. Cheers for that, pal :p) -I now believe that Shinkai is a master at evoking sympathy for his characters but this time around, it may not extend as far as empathy.

This one negative factor may be offputting for some but for me it isn’t a big deal, which may explain why it’s still in my top ten. The ending in particular is one of my favourites too - I’m not ashamed to admit it brought me to tears on my first viewing (thank heavens I was in a dimly-lit cinema at the time) and still gets me every time I watch it. It’s the double-whammy of seeing Sayuri realise what she has lost but also what she is able to gain from here on which makes it a deliberately open ending but also one filled with hope for the future. This movie is certainly unusual but is also wistful, nostalgic, heart-rending and very personal. I still love it.







Posted on September 14th, 2007 @ 3:05 am
I wholeheartedly agree. I think you summed up the work perfectly, as The Place Promised does have its flaws, but as a whole, it remans one of my top favorite animated movies, and I love the ending. And the music.
I am jealous you got to see this in cinema, though. You lucky dog, you.
Posted on September 14th, 2007 @ 7:43 pm
Thanks so much for the mention, I’m honoured, as usual. (:
I need to watch this show once more to see if my opinion of it’s changed much. I felt that it felt like an elongated trailer at times (yours truly having watched not one, not two, but four different trailers of it while waiting for it; see SUGOI HIKOUKI for more details), and my second viewing of it was rather “meh”. Of course, that was before I took up the “anime apologist” lens, and my first impressions of it might have been distorted somewhat.
Again, I find myself wondering, being in a rather loveless state then — did my lack of interaction with people in particular, seeing how I went through a sort-of social withdrawal phase, endear me less to it? I don’t know. But I suppose your post has motivated me to hunt down the show and watch it for what might be the last time in ages, because I think that while Shinkai did good with 5cm, he didn’t go higher than what The Place Promised did. He seems to have reached a plateau of sorts, and will be, if he doesn’t move on from the “distance” theme that we’re all heartily sick of by now.
Posted on September 15th, 2007 @ 12:37 am
@Belle: Thanks! I had the honour at the Anime all-nighter, organised by Sci-fi London, of seeing this movie in 2006. It left one hell of an impression on me.
@Owen: Cheers. I’ll be reviewing 5cm in the next week or so but TBH Shinkai’s stuff leaves me…emotionally drained is the best way to describe it. Anyway, I’ll review it but it’ll be after I’ve gathered my thoughts and let it stew in my head for a few days first.
As for how it compares with 5cm, I’ll be covering that in length as part of my 5cm review but Place Promised feels more similar to Voices in that it’s a sci-fi romance movie while 5cm is a more pure romantic drama. Shinkai seems to ‘come of age’ as it were with 5cm, while this still needs to fall back onto sci-fi plot devices; it gives a stupendous emotional clout but the plot still leads the viewer by the nose. My experience with 5cm was less of “here’s a film maker leading me in a certain direction and a certain gamut of emotions.” and more of “here’s a situation…make of it what you will.”
Basically, Place Promised was a stunning and affecting film but not the endpoint of Shinkai’s learning curve as a director. No doubt I’ll be able to explain this more clearly when 1) I’ve not been drinking and 2) I’m not experiencing the emotional ‘afterglow’ of one of his movies. I’m not mentally - and sentimentally - ready to take on another one of his just yet!
Posted on September 15th, 2007 @ 7:57 am
I really agree with your review of the Promised Place, the movie clearly shows Shinkai’s progression as a film maker. The Promised Place is a much more complete work of art than Voices was, but I feel that Voices will still be remembered as a more groundbreaking work of art. The only gripe that I have with Shinkai’s films is that he is always looking towards the past, while it’s fine to try and recapture that lost feeling for a first love, one should not be eternally haunted by the ghosts of lost loves. The reasons why Miyazaki’s movies are so popular is that he is able to mix in the proper amount of nostalgia with a good dose of a hopeful future. When Shinkai’s is finally able to achieve this then he’ll be considered a master film maker like Miyazaki.
Posted on September 15th, 2007 @ 9:30 pm
@Chris: Absolutely. The overall sense of hope is what gives Miyazaki’s movies such a great ‘warm fuzzy feeling’, which I think is down to the fact that they’re intended primarily for younger viewers, while Shinkai is appealing to older teens/young adults. Miyazaki’s stuff is also quite universal, while Shinkai sticks to the romance/drama; as Owen and many others have pointed out, it’s probably time for Shinkai to branch out and move on from the same themes of lost love and loneliness, which would probably earn him a wider audience. We’ll just have to wait and see what he does next really.
Posted on April 15th, 2008 @ 4:31 pm
Hi,
I just came across your review. Would you mind explaining the “problem” of empathy encountered insofar as I observe there are a variety of cues to “prod” the viewer along a certain path?
Thanks a lot.